1 (800) 998-9075 | (Toll free) +1 (407) 379-4907

5 5 Accounting for a lease termination lessee

11 Dec

5 5 Accounting for a lease termination lessee

accounting for lease termination costs

Accordingly, X and Y account for the transaction as a sale and leaseback. From both a lessor and lessee perspective, the operating lease income or expense is generally recognised on a straight- line basis over the lease term in accordance with FRS 102 paragraphs 20.25 and 20.15 respectively. Under IFRS, the exercise of an unplanned purchase option requires a reassessment of our lease liability and corresponding lease asset. Any variances to the asset and liability balances will be recorded as gain or loss. To terminate a lease is to cancel the agreement before the end of the specified lease term.

  • It’s also crucial to properly disclose the details of the partial lease termination in the financial statements, including the impact on net income, any gains or losses recognized, and other relevant qualitative information.
  • The entity will need to assess whether, at the inception of the lease, it is reasonably certain that it will continue to lease the asset for the further 3 year period.
  • As of May 31, 2025 the remaining lease liability and right-of-use asset were $6,201,663.09 and $6,043,626.29 respectively.
  • Simply add a modification and these calculations will be automatically taken care of.
  • However, for the purposes of this article the termination and the accounting recognition of the termination occur at the same time.
  • Simply derecognize the lease liability and ROU asset and recognize any differences in gain or loss.

The LeaseQuery system utilizes the approach based on the proportionate adjustment to the lease liability, since a lessee would have this information readily available after calculating the modified liability. Like many aspects of lease accounting on face value, the accounting appears straightforward. When a lease has been terminated in its entirety, the lessee should What Financial Statement Lists Retained Earnings? no longer recognize a right of use asset and a lease liability. If you are contemplating a possible lease termination, please contact your tax and accounting expert to assist you in applying this guidance in your specific circumstances. Further, an organization shall apply the same approach for all partial terminations across all leases as a policy election.

Example 1 – lease termination

EBooks are available to logged-in ICAEW members, ACA students and other entitled users. If you are unable to access an eBook, please see our Help and support advice or contact Eligible firms have free access to Bloomsbury Professional’s comprehensive online library, comprising more than 60 titles from some of the country’s leading tax and accounting subject matter experts. Find out who is eligible and how you can access the Bloomsbury Accounting and Tax Service.

  • The allocation should produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
  • While there are two acceptable approaches to measure the ROU asset under ASC 842, IFRS 16 only has one option – to reduce the ROU asset by the proportionate change in the remaining ROU asset.
  • ICAEW cannot accept responsibility for any person acting or refraining to act as a result of any material contained in this helpsheet.
  • For example, a lessee leases 3 floors in an office building and vacates one of the leased floors.

As an accounting policy election, companies should apply the modification approach consistently to all similar lease terminations. While the modified lease liability value was calculated above, in this approach, the pre-modification lease liability value is used to calculate if there is a gain/loss on partial termination. The carrying amount of the lease liability before modification ($27,089,980) is reduced by the percentage change in the remaining ROU asset. While there are two acceptable approaches to measure the ROU asset under ASC 842, IFRS 16 only has one option – to reduce the ROU asset by the proportionate change in the remaining ROU asset. Example 17 – Modification That Decreases the Scope of the Lease within IFRS 16 illustrates the approach to account for for partial terminations. As above, the difference between the reduction in the liability and proportionate change in the ROU asset will be recognized as a gain or loss (IFRS 16.46).

Accounting For Lease Contract Termination

Due to the partial termination, the company will now use its incremental borrowing rate on January 1, 2026, 6.75%, so the present value of the remaining lease payments is $18,211,776. This will result in a $8,878,204 ($27,089,980 – $18,211,776) decrease in the lease liability. The modified lease liability calculation will remain consistent in both of the approaches below. However, the value of the ROU asset will change based on the approach selected. As a lessee, it’s important to understand how to properly account for partial lease terminations to ensure accurate financial reporting and maintain compliance with ASC 842. In this blog post, we will break down the complexities of termination accounting under ASC 842 and provide practical considerations and best practices for accounting for partial lease terminations.

accounting for lease termination costs

The links are provided ‘as is’ with no warranty, express or implied, for the information provided within them. FRS 102 is regularly updated and amended by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC). For the full text of FRS 102, guidance on which version of the standard to apply and notes on recent amendments, see our main FRS 102 page. “Large language model startups, consumer internet companies and global cloud service providers were the first movers, and the next waves are starting to build. Nations and regional CSPs are investing in AI clouds to serve local demand, enterprise software companies are adding AI copilots and assistants to their platforms, and enterprises are creating custom AI to automate the world’s largest industries. I would write-off when I knew the liability with the lease was officially over (when you gave the keys back).


The agreement states that Company L will lease five floors of a building for office space at $6,000,000 per year increasing by 3% over a period of 10 years. Company L has determined it will use its incremental borrowing rate on January 1, 2020, to value this arrangement. A detailed, practical chapter on financial reporting of leases under FRS 102, containing many examples. Includes sections on classification, lessee accounting – finance and operating leases, lessor accounting – finance and operating leases, manufacturers and dealers and disclosure requirements. Subsequently, a lessee apportions the minimum lease payments between the finance charge and the reduction of the outstanding lease liability using the effective interest method (FRS 102 paragraph 20.11). The allocation should produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.

The relevant performance obligation would be the effective ‘transfer’ of the asset to the lessor by the previous owner (now the lessee). In the case of both payments in arrears and payments in advance, the non-current liability is represented by the balance outstanding immediately after the payment in year two. In both cases, the current liability is the difference between the total liability at the end of year one (ie the end of the current year) and the non-current The Accounting Equation: A Beginners’ Guide liability. This means that for payments in advance, the current liability would simply be $80,000 in this example. Where payments are made in advance, the non-current liability would be the subtotal for year two ($866,198) and not the total liability carried forward at the end of year two as is the case with payments in arrears. This is because, with payments in advance, the balance carried forward at the end of year two includes the finance cost for year two.


Leave a Reply: